|
|
Copyright RantDisclaimer: This is just a rant of mine, it doesn't represent any legal position or anything. Also, being a rant, I kind of wander all over the place in no coherent pattern. You have been warned. NOTE: I would later learn that indeed Fox was NOT responsible for the email I received, so any place where I mention it may be Fox, I was wrong. Please see the content update for more details. I am leaving this rant in place as is to show the frustration that I go through, and also many of the points are still valid for other people/companies. Running my not for money website that I have made just to provide information about an artist and his paintings that I find interesting, I have run into several problems with copyrights. I've had several people and one anonymous entity (which I am pretty sure is the copyright people for Fox) contact me about copyright materials on my website (to which I don't have any rights to). Now don't get me wrong, I'm not one of those people who thanks that everything in existence should be free and we should be able to download anything we want, but it does annoy me when people start bothering small noncommercial websites about their almighty copyrights. I must also admit though, that this has the most to do with the "anonymous entity case" than the other ones. In fact Demarco Productions actually let me display one of the pictures after I explained my situation (Demarco Productions = cool, buy DPP stuff through them, don't have a weblink though). Now back to the anonymous entity. About 3 days after I move my server to my school so it can have an internet connection over the summer, I get an email from the head of my school's computing department (and technically my boss, but a couple levels above me) saying that an "outside source" has said that I might be violating U.S. copyright law. Now I am assuming that the person who sent my the email is just the messenger in this ordeal, so I will blame the lawyers. Since this is my school and my boss, I had to take this really seriously (I want to graduate) so my website was offline for a couple of weeks. After looking through everything, I figure this "outside source" is referring to 2 30 second video clips of the Simpsons that I had on my website. Now that I think about it, I was wrong (although this is not an admission of guilt in the court of law) and it is within "Fox's" right to request this. Here is my problem with this though:
So in conclusion, if you have a problem (or compliment) with my website, please contact me first and I will be more than happy to work things out. Don't do |
|
Copyright © 2001-2008 DogsPlayingPoker.org |
|